Comparisons
Leap vs Bolt
Production-grade infrastructure vs browser-based development - when to use each approach
Bolt excels at browser-based development and rapid prototyping with WebContainers. Leap builds production-grade distributed systems with real cloud infrastructure.
Key differences
Leap | Bolt | |
---|---|---|
Approach | Production-grade distributed systems | Browser-based development |
Deploys to your own cloud (AWS/GCP) | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
Real backend logic & microservices | ✅ Yes | ❌ Limited |
Infrastructure-as-code by default | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
Built-in distributed tracing | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
Multi-environment support | ✅ Yes | ❌ Limited |
Type-safe distributed systems | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
Avoids vendor lock-in | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
When to choose each
Choose Bolt for:
- Quick full-stack prototyping in the browser
- Learning frameworks without local setup
- Single applications deploying to Netlify/Cloudflare
- Rapid experimentation and iteration
Choose Leap for:
- Production distributed systems with microservices
- Real backend infrastructure and databases
- Deployment to your own AWS/GCP account
- Enterprise applications requiring scalability
The difference
Bolt generates single applications that work well for standalone projects and platform deployment.
Leap generates complete distributed systems with multiple services, databases, and cloud infrastructure that scale to enterprise requirements.